Difference between revisions of "Igor"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== <span style="font-size:x-large;">Hyperbaric oxygen therapy may improve mobility, reduce complications and return circulation in post-amputation patients have rehabilitation for prosthesis fitting.</span> == | == <span style="font-size:x-large;">Hyperbaric oxygen therapy may improve mobility, reduce complications and return circulation in post-amputation patients have rehabilitation for prosthesis fitting.</span> == | ||
| + | |||
| + | <span style="font-size:large;">Clinical bottom line:</span> | ||
{| | {| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | | <span style="font-size:large;">'''1. Evidence of a number of benefits in mobility and return of peripheral circulation in patients undergoing a rehabilitation program for prosthesis fitting'''</span> |
|} | |} | ||
| | ||
| − | | + | <span style="font-size:medium;">'''Citation/s: '''1, Igor S, Mirka T, Dalibor P, Milutin R, Dusica D, Vladimir Z, Vladimir J. Hyperbaric oxygenation accelerates prosthetic rehabilitation of lower limb amputees. Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine 2013;40(3):289-287.</span> |
| − | + | <span style="font-size:medium;">'''Lead author's name and fax: '''J Vladimir drvladakgbg@yahoo.com</span> | |
| − | | + | '''Three-part Clinical Question:'''''' ''<span style="font-size: medium;">For patients undergoing rehabilitation and the fitting of prosthetic limbs after amputation, does the addition of hyperbaric oxygen therapy improve rehabilitation?</span> |
| − | + | <span style="font-size:medium;">'''Search Terms:''' amputation; rehabilitation; prosthesis</span> | |
| − | + | <span style="font-size:medium;">'''The Study:''' Non-blinded randomised controlled trial with intention-to-treat.</span> | |
| − | + | <span style="font-size:medium;">'''The Study Patients:''' Patients with unilateral lower limb amputation and where a rehabilitation program for fitting of a prosthetic limb is planned.</span> | |
| − | <span style="font-size: | + | <span style="font-size:medium;">'''Control group''' (N = 30; 30 analysed): A standard prosthetic assessment and rehabilitation program including orthopaedic assessment, physiotherapy, laser therapy, magnetotherapy, electrotherapy, thermotherapy and electrical stimulation.</span> |
| − | + | <span style="font-size:medium;">'''Experimental group''' (N = 30; 30 analysed): As above plus 15 sessions of HBOT at 1.7 ATA for 60 minutes</span> | |
| | ||
| − | <span style="font-size: | + | <span style="font-size:medium;">'''The Evidence:'''</span> |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | ''' | ||
{| class="Table" style="border: 1pt solid windowtext; width: 879px;" | {| class="Table" style="border: 1pt solid windowtext; width: 879px;" | ||
| Line 151: | Line 141: | ||
|} | |} | ||
| − | + | <span style="font-size:medium;">'''Comments:'''</span> | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | <span style="font-size: | + | <span style="font-size:medium;">1. Functional outcome using an 'adapted Narang Scale' is not explained so omitted here.</span> |
| − | <span style="font-size: | + | <span style="font-size:medium;">2. Locomotor capability index and thigh girth have been read from a graph.</span> |
| − | <span style="font-size: | + | <span style="font-size:medium;">3. Other benefits stated in the paper not quantified - only p-values given.</span> |
| − | <span style="font-size: | + | <span style="font-size:medium;">4. It is difficult to understand how HBOT can return palpable peripheral pulses as suggested here. Authors suggest "we can assume that HBO2 significantly affected peripheral vascularization of our patients". This is an extraordinary claim.</span> |
| − | <span style="font-size: | + | <span style="font-size:medium;">5. Many findings in this study have a high chance of bias due to the unblinded nature of the study.</span> |
| − | <span style="font-size: | + | <span style="font-size:medium;">'''Appraised by:''' Mike Bennett m.bennett@unsw.edu.au ; Sunday, 1 October 2017</span> |
| − | <span style="font-size: | + | <span style="font-size:medium;">'''Kill or Update By:''' July 2021</span> |
[[File:Sumhorsa.gif|center|Sumhorsa.gif]] | [[File:Sumhorsa.gif|center|Sumhorsa.gif]] | ||
<span style="color: #7c00ff; display: block; font-size: 26px; text-align: center;">'''[[Acute_ischaemia|BACK]]'''</span> | <span style="color: #7c00ff; display: block; font-size: 26px; text-align: center;">'''[[Acute_ischaemia|BACK]]'''</span> | ||
Revision as of 03:17, 18 August 2021
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy may improve mobility, reduce complications and return circulation in post-amputation patients have rehabilitation for prosthesis fitting.
Clinical bottom line:
| 1. Evidence of a number of benefits in mobility and return of peripheral circulation in patients undergoing a rehabilitation program for prosthesis fitting |
Citation/s: 1, Igor S, Mirka T, Dalibor P, Milutin R, Dusica D, Vladimir Z, Vladimir J. Hyperbaric oxygenation accelerates prosthetic rehabilitation of lower limb amputees. Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine 2013;40(3):289-287.
Lead author's name and fax: J Vladimir drvladakgbg@yahoo.com
Three-part Clinical Question:' For patients undergoing rehabilitation and the fitting of prosthetic limbs after amputation, does the addition of hyperbaric oxygen therapy improve rehabilitation?
Search Terms: amputation; rehabilitation; prosthesis
The Study: Non-blinded randomised controlled trial with intention-to-treat.
The Study Patients: Patients with unilateral lower limb amputation and where a rehabilitation program for fitting of a prosthetic limb is planned.
Control group (N = 30; 30 analysed): A standard prosthetic assessment and rehabilitation program including orthopaedic assessment, physiotherapy, laser therapy, magnetotherapy, electrotherapy, thermotherapy and electrical stimulation.
Experimental group (N = 30; 30 analysed): As above plus 15 sessions of HBOT at 1.7 ATA for 60 minutes
The Evidence:
Outcome |
Time to Outcome |
Control Group |
Hyperbaric Group |
Relative risk reduction |
Absolute risk reduction |
NNT |
|
Complications (e.g. dehiscence, phantom pain, haematoma) |
Discharge |
1.00 |
0.87 |
13% |
0.13 |
8 |
95% CIs: |
1% to 25% |
0.01 to 0.26 |
4 to 87 | |||
|
Stump contracture |
Discharge |
0.20 |
0.13 |
34% |
0.07 |
15 |
95% CIs: |
-60% to 100% |
-0.12 to 0.26 |
NNT 4 to INF; NNH8 to INF | |||
|
Return of palpable peripheral pulses |
Discharge |
0 |
0.27 |
INF |
0.27 |
4 |
95% CIs: |
0.11 to 0.43 |
2 to 9 |
Measure |
Control Group |
Hyperbaric Group |
Difference |
95% CI | |||
Mean |
SD |
Mean |
SD |
||||
|
Locomotor capability index at discharge |
34 |
9 |
38 |
11 |
4 |
1.2 to 9.2 | |
|
Two minute walking test at discharge (feet) |
74 |
21 |
90 |
32 |
16 |
2.0 to 30.0 |
Comments:
1. Functional outcome using an 'adapted Narang Scale' is not explained so omitted here.
2. Locomotor capability index and thigh girth have been read from a graph.
3. Other benefits stated in the paper not quantified - only p-values given.
4. It is difficult to understand how HBOT can return palpable peripheral pulses as suggested here. Authors suggest "we can assume that HBO2 significantly affected peripheral vascularization of our patients". This is an extraordinary claim.
5. Many findings in this study have a high chance of bias due to the unblinded nature of the study.
Appraised by: Mike Bennett m.bennett@unsw.edu.au ; Sunday, 1 October 2017
Kill or Update By: July 2021