Hart

Revision as of 21:17, 9 October 2021 by M.bennett (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

The addition of hyperbaric oxygen to a burn care protocol resulted in a reduction in the time required for burn to heal.

Clinical Bottom Line:

1. The addition of hyperbaric oxygen reduced the time to burn healing.

2. Any effect on fluid requirements remains unclear


Citations:1. Hart GB, O'Reilly RR, Broussard ND, Goodman DB, Yanda RL. Treatment of burns with hyperbaric oxygen. Surgery, Gynaecology and Obstetrics 1974; 139:693-696.

Clinical Scenario:A patient presented with thermal burns and we wondered if the addition of hyperbaric oxygen would improve healing time.

Three-part Question:In patients with thermal burns, does the addition of hyperbaric oxygen to a standard burn care protocol result in any improvement in time required to heal, or the quality of healing?

Search Terms:Thermal burns

The Study:Double-blinded concealed randomised controlled trial with intention-to-treat. Patients with between 10 and 50% of body surface area thermal burns presenting to a burns centre within 24 hours of injury.

Control group(N = 16; 16 analysed): A standard burns protocol with fluid resuscitation, dressings and surgical procedures. Sham hyperbaric exposures in a chamber compressed to 1.3ATA and returned to 1ATA gradually at beginning and end of time period.

Experimental group(N = 16; 16 analysed): Protocol as above plus 100% oxygen breathing at 2 ATA for 90 minutes every 8 hours in the first 24 hours, then 12 hourly until healed.

The Evidence:

Non-event outcomes

Time to outcome

Air group

HBO group

P-value

Average volume of crystalloid required (mls/kg/%BSA)

24 hours

3.4

2.2

Not tested

Mean healing time (days)

Healing

43.8

19.7

<0.005

 

Comments:

1. Small study with paired stratification by surface area burnt.

2. Good randomisation and blinding.

3. Power to detect a significant improvement in fluid requirements or graft success unknown, but likely to be low.

4. Some suggestion of improvement in proportion of grafts taking in hyperbaric group (1/2 controls, 2/2 HBO).

4. Morbidity and mortality data in this paper do not relate to this RCT.

Appraised by:Mike Bennett, Dept of Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney; Thursday, 22 April 1999

Expiry date:December 2024

Sumhorsa.gif

BACK