Hoffman3

No evidence of efficacy for hyperbaric oxygen in acute hearing loss or tinnitus of long-standing.

Clinical Bottom Line:

1. No evidence of improvement in hearing loss or tinnitus with the administration of hyperbaric oxygen.

 2. Pressurization was associated with some benefit in both groups.


Citation/s:1. Hoffmann G, Bohmer D, Desloovere C. Hyperbaric oxygen as a treatment of chronic forms of inner ear hearing loss and tinnitus.In: Wen-ren Li. Proceedings of the Eleventh International Congress of Hyperbaric Medicine, Fuzhou, China. Best Publishing, Flagstaff, Arizona 1993:141-145.

 

Clinical Scenario:A patient with long-standing hearing loss and tinnitus presented for treatment and we wondered if there was any place for hyperbaric oxygen.

Three-part Question:For patients with hearing loss and/or tinnitus of acute onset, where the loss is of long standing (>6 months), does the application of hyperbaric oxygen, compared to placebo, result in any improvement in hearing loss or tinnitus?

Search Terms:Hyperbaric oxygen, deafness, tinnitus

The Study:Double-blinded randomised controlled trial with intention-to-treat. Patients with a history of sudden onset of inner-ear hearing loss and/or tinnitus lasting at least 6 months.

Control group (N = 22; 22 analysed):Air breathing at 1.5ATA for 45 minutes daily, five days each week for 3 weeks.

Experimental group (N = 22; 22 analysed):100% oxygen breathing at 1.5ATA on the same schedule as controls.

The Evidence:

Outcome

Time to Outcome

Control group

HBO group

Relative risk reduction

Absolute risk reduction

NNT

Improved hearing

3 weeks

0.5

0.33

34%

0.17

6

95% CI:

-23% to 91%

-0.12 to 0.46

NNT2 to INF

NNH=9 to INF

Improved tinnitus

3 weeks

0.41

0.18

56%

0.23

4

95% CI:

-8% to 100%

-0.03 to 0.49

NNT2 to INF

NNH=32 to INF

 

Comments:

1. Control group was pressurized and breathed an increased PO2. Any benefit may be due to a placebo effect, pressure effect or oxygen effect (equivalent 31.5% oxygen at 1ATA).

2. All patients received a second course of hyperbaric oxygen at 1.5ATA immediately following the trial course, making comparative longer-term follow-up impossible.

3. 15 treatments may have been insufficient in this chronic, well-established condition.

 

Appraised by:Mike Bennett, Dept. of Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine, Prince of Wales Hospital,Sydney; Wednesday, 28 July 1999

Expiry date:June 2022

Sumhorsa.gif

 

BACK