Lacey

No evidence of any benefit from a course of hyperbaric oxygen for children with spastic cerebral palsy.

Clinical Bottom Line:

1. Hyperbaric oxygen did not improve gross motor function measures compared to a sham treatment.
2. The Paediatric Evaluation of Disability scores improved in both groups, but was not clinically important.


Citation/s:1. Lacey DJ, Stolfi A, Pilati LE. Effects of hyperbaric oxygen on motor function in children with cerebral palsy. Annals of neurology. 2012 Nov 1;72(5):695-703
Lead author's name and fax: Daniel Lacey: laceyd@childrensdayton.org

Three-part Clinical Question:For children with spastic cerebral palsy, does the addition of a course of hyperbaric oxygen to standard therapy result in any improvement in gross motor function?
Search Terms: Cerebral Palsy; motor function; paediatrics

The Study:Double-blinded concealed randomised controlled trial with intention-to-treat.
The Study Patients: Children aged 3 to 8 years with spastic cerebral palsy
Control group (N = 24; 22 analysed): 14% oxygen breathing at 1.5 ATA for 80 minutes daily, Monday to Friday to a total of 40 sessions over 8 weeks.
Experimental group (N = 25; 24 analysed): As above but breathing 100% oxygen.

The Evidence:

 

Measure

Sham Group

HBO Group

Difference

95% CI

Mean

SD

Mean

SD

Gross Motor Function Measure-88 (end of treatment)

41.2

29.6

40.8

33.4

-0.4

-595 to 595

Pediatric Evaluation of Disability -self care category (end of treatment)

49.5

15.2

52.1

20.5

2.6

-199 to 194

Comments:
1. 14% oxygen breathing at 1.5 ATA was to achieve the same PIO2 as breathing air at 1 ATA.
2. Sample size calculation suggested 42 patients in each group was required to find a 5% improvement in the HBO group versus the sham group. The trial was stopped early for futility on a planned interim analysis. Six month follow-up did not suggest a different outcome.
3. Patients randomised in permuted blocks of various sizes with allocation concealment and not likely subject to bias.
4. GMFM-88 has been validated in this group. PEDI scores improved statistically significantly but not to a clinically important extent in both groups, but did not differ between groups and this seemed to persist through to the six month follow-up on. Authors suggest this is a participation effect.
5. About one third of children experienced ear pain during the course of treatment and two required withdrawal of treatment (one in each group).

Appraised by:Mike Bennett POWH m.bennett@unsw.edu.au; Saturday, 25 September 2021

Kill or Update By: September 2026

 

Sumhorsa.gif

BACK