Chng

Revision as of 01:52, 3 January 2020 by M.bennett (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

A full immersion suit did not cause important thermal stress to escaped submariners

Clinical bottom line:

1. There was no practical important difference in the thermal protection between the full immersion and half immersion suits, although the full suit had statistically higher maximum and minimum mean temperatures over 24 hours.
2.Cold intolerance was a problem and one of 12 individuals was removed from the half-suit group at 18 hours.

Citation:
Chng J, Wan MC, Lim CL, Kang WL. A comparison of thermal stress in the submarine escape using immersion half- and full suit in tropical weather operations. Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine 2010;37(6):447-454.
Lead author's name and fax: Jeremia Chng, chngjeremiah@hotmail.com

Three-part Clinical Question:For submariners who have escaped from a submarine, does the use of a full-configuration immersion suit, compared to a half-configuration suit, result in significant heat stress?
Search Terms: Submarine escape, survival suit, hyperthermia

The Study:
Non-blinded randomised controlled trial with intention-to-treat.
The Study Patients: Volunteer male submariners
Control group (N = 7; 7 analysed): BFA suit - 7 full and 12 half suits.. Ingested temperature sensor capsule. Wetted before being placed in the escape raft for 24 hours.
Experimental group (N = 12; 11 analysed): Beaufort suit - 7 full and 12 half suits. Methods as above.

The Evidence:

Measure

Full suit

Half suit

Difference

95% CI

Mean

SD

Mean

SD

Thermal comfort score (-7 very cold to +7 very hot)

3.2

1.1

2.7

1.1

0.5

-0.71 to 1.71

 

Non-Event Outcomes

Time to outcome

Full suit

Half suit

P-value

Mean maximum temperature (full versus half suit) Centigrade

24 hours

37.8

37.6

0.01

Mean minimum temperature (full versus half suit) Centigrade

24 hours

36.1

36.0

0.03

Comments:
1. One volunteer pulled out of the half suit trial due to cold
2. There were no statistically significant differences between the suits from the two different suit manufacturers.
3. There were no differences between the groups with respect to water intake, urine output or weight change.
4. Full immersion suit was safe and did not induce problematic hyperthermia but this trial did not expose the volunteers to direct sunlight or a waiting period of longer than 24 hours.

Mike Bennett, Prince of Wales Hospital m.bennett@unsw.edu.au; Saturday, 28 December 2019
Kill or Update By: December 2024

Sumhorsa.gif

BACK