Risberg

Revision as of 01:39, 26 November 2018 by Gordoben (talk | contribs) (Imported from Wikispaces)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

No reduction in detectable venous bubbles in volunteer hyperbaric attendants with nitrox breathing or increased 100% oxygen breathing periods.

1. There were no important differences in the grade or frequency of venous bubbles detected between the three arms of the study.

** 2. There was no measured advantage to any of the three experimental profiles.
    • Citation/s:

1. Risberg J, Englund M, Aanderud L, Eftedal O, Flook V, Thorsen E. Venous gas embolism in chamber attendants after hyperbaric exposure. Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine 2004;31(4):417-429.

Lead author's name and fax: Jan Risberg no contact given

    • Three-part Clinical Question: For attendants during hyperbaric oxygen treatment sessions, does modification of the breathing gas, compared to air breathing, reduce the degree of venous bubbling associated?

Search Terms: Doppler bubble detection; decompression stress; occupational diving

    • The Study: Double-blinded concealed randomised controlled trial with intention-to-treat.

The Study Patients: Volunteer females employed at the participating centres. Volunteers acted as their own controls.

Control group (N = 9; 9 analysed): Compression to 2.4 ATA over 15 minutes, followed by 95 minutes breathing air, then five minutes on 100% oxygen before decompression on 100% oxygen over seven minutes (routine group).

Experimental group (N = 10; 10 analysed): Two experimental groups. The same profile but with 10 minutes on 100% oxygen at 2.4 ATA and during the decompression over 14 minutes (revised group); and a third group that breathed 40.5% oxygen for three 30 minute periods at 2.4 ATA, but no 100% oxygen periods (Nitrox group).

    • The Evidence:
Outcome Time to Outcome Control group Combined experimental groups Relative risk reduction Absolute risk reduction NNT
VGE present after exposure (proportion) 15 minutes 0.67 0.80 -20% -0.13 -8
^ 95% CIs: -79% to 39% -0.53 to 0.26 NNT 4 to INF; NNH 2 to INF
    • Comments:

1. Very small study of only 10 subjects. 2. The usefulness of using VGE detection to quantify decompression stress in this population is unclear. 3. Using a mathematical model, the authors calculated that the routine, revised and nitrox series would release 2.1, 1.3 and 1.6 µl gas/ml blood into the bubbles in the central venous blood. 4. The authors switched to monoplace chambers for routine treatment following this investigation

Appraised by: Mike Bennett m.bennett@unsw.edu.au; Tuesday, 6 December 2016

Kill or Update By: December 2021

Sumhorsa.gif

BACK